بعض الناس معجبون بزواج المتعة والبعض الاخر بالزواج فقط من اجل المتعة و حديثا بدا الزواج العرفي بالانتشار والفكرة تعجب الكثيرين لان الشغلة ما فيها مسؤولية ولا ارتباط ولا اطفال ولا اساس لتكوين عائلة كل ما فيه انو اثنين معجبين ببعض بس مش عارفين ينامو مع بعض فبقرروا يظحكوا على الناس وعلى الله بورقة
و جديد اجت فكرة عبقرية اسمها زواج فريند تهدف الى حماية الشباب والشابات من تاثير "الانحلال الاخلاقي" للغرب علينا لذلك يسمح الزواج فريند بهذا الانحلال لكن هذا الانحلال بكون انحلال برخصة يعني وثيقة يوقعها الشاب والفتاة المؤدبان العفيفان الذان تحت تاثير الغرب الكافر تاثرت اخلاقهما لكنهما سيوقعان على هذه الورقة وبذلك سيمارسان "حقوقهم الزوجية" بينما الشباب الغربي شعب فاسق لانه يمارس المجون دون توقيع هذه الورقة
مشان الله يا جماعة هذه المصطلحات كالزواج العرفي والمتعة والزواج افريند شوهت من سمعة الدعارة واعطتها اسما سيئا لذلك ادعوا الجميع ال احترام اقدم مهنة في التاريخ وتسميتها باسمها الصحيح
Posts
15 comments:
But of course all this forms of marriage are not made permissible by any religion! It's a matter of some people try to work around their traditions, people who get into these kind of matrimonial contracts don't care in the most part about religion, they just want to spare themselves the people and their "geel and gaal"..
I hate when new kind of marriages are issued every moment! I mean, everyone thinks that all ppl in USA have pre-martial sex and it's not true..the arabs just wanna copy the bad guys!
any suggestions people....it seems like you live in another realm where all the problems are miniatured thanks to a bloody "charitable" government that will give me money to get married.
i have a friend who told me that he didn't quit his postgraduate studies and go working in a prestigious bank in Jordan just to get payed to "barely live" which basically means that if you look up his ASS you'll only see " 6agm snaaaan", How will he satisfy himself?!?!
I like the way you wrote this.
you are right but on the other hand, elshabab wel sabaya have big problem that it has so be solved..
in other words, this marriages are the result of the corrupted society.
LOL , u have a point , law kan fi naqabeh for that kan talabat be 7oqoohom !
CheeerZ!
oofff oof elwa7ad sho bedo y7ki la y7ki...
they do mistakes then after it be7alelo 3la 7alhom sho 3emlo...
tab y3ni go u namo m3 ba3ad laish t3almo ba2i elnas...
min alil elnas batalt tetjawaz
Actually I remember reading about this (zawaj friends) when it was first in the news.
The idea didn't sound wrong as an Islamic concept. All the elements of marriage in Islam had to be met. The only thing that made that proposal different is that the couple didn't have to live in a house of their own and that they could still live with their parents. There is no rule in Islam (or any other religion that I know of) that clearly states that the couple have to live in a house of their own together.
In the end, al a3mal bel niyyat.
bassel, let him satisfy himself the way he wants but don't call it marriage and he shouldn't fool others saying he's married. Religion , regardless what it is, is tough and not easy to follow. IT's not easy to abide by religion.
Anonymous... what upsets me is calling these relationships "marriage" and aprroving them by religious people.
hamzeh... ma fee moqaddam wala mo2akkhar, there's no intention to have kids and start a family.
لهذا نقول أن المرأة و هي فتنة مكانها البيت الذي هو مملكتها و يعطيها كامل حقوقها
إزا مات زوجها الذي بالغالب هة ابن عمها، فان شيخ فاضل و جليل يتزوجها و يستر عليها
أرجعوا نساءنا غلى المطابخ و البيت و اذا لا سمح الله خرجت من البيت فعليها بالبرقع من فوق لتحت
نسيت زواج المسيار يا فارس يا رعديد
sho ya3ni zawaj frend? "Friends"? mish fahmeh, w ma sme3t fee, sho be5talef 3an il 3orfi?
"hamzeh... ma fee moqaddam wala mo2akkhar, there's no intention to have kids and start a family.
That really doesn't mean anything though.
First, even if the moqaddam and mo2akhar was required in Islam, I doubt that there is a minimum to it, which would make a moqaddam and mo2akhar of 1 cent permissable and this option of "zawaj friends" will still be facilitated. Even if there was a minimum amount to the mahr. I doubt that it's high enough that any person would not be able to pay it. So again, the "zawaj friends" would still go on while satisfying this requirement (if it exists).
Second, how do you measure the presence of the intention to start a family in any marriage? What determines whether two people who want to get married have that intention or not? When someone wants to get married, they will try to get married and whatever reason authorities tell them they must have they will claim to have. Even in regular marriages today, what is the mechanism used to determine whether this "requirement" is satisfied? None that couldn't be applied to "zawaj friends", right?
I don't think it's about the mahr or the faimly or anything. It's about costs. Today, there are couples who want to get married, but the standard definition of what marriage is has evolved into throwing a big wedding, having a new apartment or house, fully furnished, a car maybe, etc. etc. These are peripherals to marriage, they are not in its core.
That's how I understood the concept.
@ Firas
Allow me to say that u r A SICK HUMAN BEING…women will go back to kitchen and household work in ur DREAMS! Until that time enjoy ur uncivilized mentality!
We will compete with you in every discipline until we take over all the job opportunities so men end up at home cleaning and taking care of da kids….
Cheerz!
@ArabLady
http://iheartamman.blogspot.com/2006/11/how-ill-never-be-sarcastic-again.html
actually...after (let's say 30-50 years) both men and women will work in kitchens because of WW3
i hope u'll enjoy us cooking
I propose a new kind of marriage it's called zawaj di3ara.
Gosh , jsut have sex people and get it over with...
Post a Comment